Dear students, please read carefully the general instructions
For the instructions of each group, go to the bottom of the page.
Each group writes only one page.
Part one of the page. Deadline 15 October 2017
Intro. Presentation of the group members
The team members are going to present themselves using a written presentation or a video presentation. For privacy reasons, mention only your first name (not family name), age, hobbies and your ambitions for the future. No privacy details about your family, no email addresses. Pictures: one group picture is mandatory. Individual pictures. Be aware that you publish pictures on internet. In video presentation: please speak slowly and clearly and the duration of the video is restricted to max. 2 minutes. Video on YouTube; Start always with Eumind in the title.
(Action plan)
Part two of the page. Deadline end of January 2018
Our communication and collaboration with our counterparts. New You collect evidences of your communication (screenshots, pictures of FB, whatsapp etc.) and show them on Weebly. Short report on the video conferences.
Part three of the page. Deadline End December 2017
Our research and conclusion.
How to compose your page?
a. What is the main question?
b. Process. Describe in a detailed way which research activities the group members have conducted.
How many people have been interviewed (mention names, age), summary of the outcomes etc.
Questionnaires (if applicable). Number, age level of people who have filled in a questionnaire etc.
c. Outcomes of the research. What are the outcomes?
No reports on indiviudal interviews but summarize the outcomes.
d. Make clear what the tangible outcomes are of the collaboration with the Indian/ European counterparts: common interview questions, awareness activity etc. New
e. The conclusion on the main question
Part four of the page. Deadline 30 January 2018
Conclusion/Comparison.
a. Comparison. Compare your outcomes with the research results of two other groups from Indian/EU and answer the question “What are the main similarities and differences on the subtopic”.
b. Reflection. What went well?/ What would you do differently?
Lay out
Divide the long article into three main parts: Intro plan, Research, Comparison
Student editors should study first http://euminddemo.weebly.com. Make use of the many features that Weebly provides ! Illustrate your report with pictures. Use the caption to give basic information about the picture.
You tube movies. .Give the video the tag Eumind. Embed the You tube movies. See Eumind demo site.
Presentations/research outcomes on Powerpoint. Upload them on Slideshare (http://www.slideshare.net) Give the Powerpoint the tag Eumind. Embed on Weebly
If you are using slides in a Power Point, make sure the text is well readable (don’t use back ground colours)
Certificates of excellence for "best articles “will be issued by the international jury
The international jury will award the best articles based upon the criteria listed below.
Direct communication in clusters
Please give evidence of the direct communication in the report on the Weebly inorder to get bonus points.
1. Introduction of the group 10 p
Text, pictures, video
2. Attractive layout 10 p
Layout: use of different features of the Weebly (columns, pictures, gallery, scribd, videos etc.
Are there enough pictures and relevant to the topic?
Is the text well readable? (font size etc.??)
Videos. Are they creative (scenario, humour) and technically well produced (sound, image)?
3. Research all topics except green manufacturing, green art 50 p
Process. Is it clear how the research has been conducted: how many interviews, how many questionnaires, who has been interviewed etc.?? The more concrete, the better. 15 p.
Content. Are all research questions covered? How good was the research? 20 p
Has the research been documented by pictures/videos? 10 p.
Conclusion. Is there a clear answer (conclusion) to the main question? 5 p.
Collaboration. Which outcomes (methods, products, activities etc.) have been reached together with counterparts in India/EU. Bonus .
New Research Green manufacturing, green art , 50 p.
Our basic idea: brainstorming, main goal, design, materials to be used etc..20 p.
How did we create the final product? Describe the process and give evidence of the different steps (pictures, movies). 30 p. .
4. Evidence of communication 10 p.
Evidence of communication with counterparts. New
Short report with screenshots, pictures of communication.
5. Comparison 10 p
Compare your outcomes with the research results of two other groups from Indian/EU. Indicate clearly which group and school.
Answer the question “What are the main similarities and differences on the subtopic”? Draw a conclusion on the comparison.
If there is no possibility to compare (no articles from EU/Indian side), please indicate why you could not compare your findings with those of the counterparts.
6. Reflection 5 p
Write a group’s reflection.
What went well? What would you do differently? Methods, group work, technical aspects etc. At least 5 lines.
7. Awareness activity 5.p. extra If applicable
Total 95 p.
If no comparison could be made, the group will be assessed on a total of 85 p.
go_green_16_scenariostudents__.doc | |
File Size: | 825 kb |
File Type: | doc |